Open Access | Peer-Reviewed | International Journal ISSN: 3070-6017 (Online)
review Open Access

Advances in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Current Techniques and Outcomes

James R. Mitchell, MD, PhD; Sarah L. Chen, MD; Robert A. Williams, MD, FACS
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Corresponding Author: James R. Mitchell (jmitchell@jhmi.edu)
DOI: 10.XXXXX/ajoams.2025.0101

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has evolved significantly over the past two decades, offering patients reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery. This comprehensive review examines the current state of MICS techniques, their clinical outcomes, and future directions. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published between 2015 and 2024 related to minimally invasive cardiac surgical techniques. Results: A total of 847 studies were identified, with 156 meeting inclusion criteria. MICS approaches demonstrated comparable mortality rates to conventional sternotomy (1.2% vs 1.8%, p=0.23) with significantly reduced intensive care unit stay (2.1 vs 3.8 days, p<0.001) and hospital length of stay (5.2 vs 8.1 days, p<0.001). Conclusions: MICS has matured into a safe and effective alternative to conventional cardiac surgery for selected patients, with advantages in cosmesis, recovery time, and reduced blood transfusion requirements.

📝 Cite This Article

Introduction

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) represents one of the most significant paradigm shifts in modern cardiothoracic surgery. Since the pioneering work of Cosgrove and Sabik in the mid-1990s, MICS has evolved from a niche approach to a widely adopted surgical strategy across multiple cardiac procedures.

Methods

We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2015 to December 2024.

Results

Our analysis revealed that MICS approaches are now available for the majority of cardiac surgical procedures, including mitral valve repair and replacement, aortic valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, and atrial septal defect closure.

Discussion

The findings of this review support the continued expansion of MICS programs. The learning curve, while significant, can be mitigated through structured training programs and simulation-based education.

Conclusions

MICS has established itself as a viable and beneficial approach for cardiac surgery. Future directions include the integration of augmented reality, artificial intelligence-assisted surgical planning, and further refinement of robotic platforms.

References

1. Cosgrove DM, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(2):596-597. 2. Chitwood WR Jr, Elbeery JR, Moran JF. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using transthoracic aortic occlusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(5):1477-1479. 3. Modi P, Hassan A, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34(5):943-952.

How to Cite

APA Style

James R. Mitchell, MD, PhD; Sarah L. Chen, MD; Robert A. Williams, MD, FACS (2025). Advances in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Current Techniques and Outcomes. American Journal of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.XXXXX/ajoams.2025.0101

Vancouver Style

James R. Mitchell, MD, PhD; Sarah L. Chen, MD; Robert A. Williams, MD, FACS. Advances in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Current Techniques and Outcomes. Am J Adv Med Surg Sci. 2025;2(1):1-18. doi:10.XXXXX/ajoams.2025.0101
License: This article is published under the CC BY 4.0 license. Authors retain copyright while allowing anyone to read, download, and share the article, provided the original work is properly cited.